Comments on: Senate Showdown? http://johnmccrarey.com/2005/04/22/senate-showdown/ Tue, 06 Jan 2009 03:08:22 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4 by: buy valium http://johnmccrarey.com/2005/04/22/senate-showdown/#comment-52985 Thu, 29 Jun 2006 03:23:40 +0000 http://johnmccrarey.com/2005/04/22/senate-showdown/#comment-52985 <strong>buy valium</strong> uk. buy valium

uk.

]]> by: vig rx http://johnmccrarey.com/2005/04/22/senate-showdown/#comment-47547 Tue, 06 Jun 2006 21:29:21 +0000 http://johnmccrarey.com/2005/04/22/senate-showdown/#comment-47547 nice site dude nice site dude

]]> by: vimax http://johnmccrarey.com/2005/04/22/senate-showdown/#comment-47220 Mon, 05 Jun 2006 18:00:20 +0000 http://johnmccrarey.com/2005/04/22/senate-showdown/#comment-47220 interesting thoughts interesting thoughts

]]> by: Beth http://johnmccrarey.com/2005/04/22/senate-showdown/#comment-3415 Fri, 22 Apr 2005 21:56:06 +0000 http://johnmccrarey.com/2005/04/22/senate-showdown/#comment-3415 Powerline has been doing a great job on this, I must admit (I've been pretty tough on them lately). Paul Mirengoff said something the other day that I said a couple of weeks ago, and I was surprised at that-- that maybe we ought to let the Dems filibuster so the people can see what a blatantly partisan stunt it is, that it really has nothing to do with the judges' qualifications. And Ashley, good for you for taking the time to find out about them on your own. I wish more people would do the same. :mrgreen: Powerline has been doing a great job on this, I must admit (I’ve been pretty tough on them lately). Paul Mirengoff said something the other day that I said a couple of weeks ago, and I was surprised at that– that maybe we ought to let the Dems filibuster so the people can see what a blatantly partisan stunt it is, that it really has nothing to do with the judges’ qualifications.

And Ashley, good for you for taking the time to find out about them on your own. I wish more people would do the same. :mrgreen:

]]> by: TJ http://johnmccrarey.com/2005/04/22/senate-showdown/#comment-3407 Fri, 22 Apr 2005 16:20:13 +0000 http://johnmccrarey.com/2005/04/22/senate-showdown/#comment-3407 And that is the whole idea of the system, atleast it was at one time ... for the judicial appointees to be reviewed, 'discussed' and then voted on. If a bad judge gets through (due to one side strong-arming the other) the 'weaker' side has the ability to use that against the 'stronger' party and, if it is deemed important enough by the voters, the 'stronger' party becomes the 'weaker' party. /TJ ... <a href="http://blog.tjevans.net">NIF</a> ... <a href="http://thewideawakes.org/">The Wide Awakes</a> And that is the whole idea of the system, atleast it was at one time … for the judicial appointees to be reviewed, ‘discussed’ and then voted on.

If a bad judge gets through (due to one side strong-arming the other) the ‘weaker’ side has the ability to use that against the ’stronger’ party and, if it is deemed important enough by the voters, the ’stronger’ party becomes the ‘weaker’ party.

/TJ
… NIF
… The Wide Awakes

]]> by: John McCrarey http://johnmccrarey.com/2005/04/22/senate-showdown/#comment-3382 Fri, 22 Apr 2005 01:33:53 +0000 http://johnmccrarey.com/2005/04/22/senate-showdown/#comment-3382 Thank you, Ashley. That's what this is all about, making up your own mind. What the Dems are doing in blocking these judges is flat out wrong. And the media is playing along by willful misrepresentation of the facts. Thank you, Ashley. That’s what this is all about, making up your own mind. What the Dems are doing in blocking these judges is flat out wrong. And the media is playing along by willful misrepresentation of the facts.

]]> by: Ashley http://johnmccrarey.com/2005/04/22/senate-showdown/#comment-3381 Fri, 22 Apr 2005 01:09:29 +0000 http://johnmccrarey.com/2005/04/22/senate-showdown/#comment-3381 here to swallow my pride and admit I have let myself be lazy and mislead. I got fed up with you talking about this and went out to get some facts to back up my claim that these judges would be horrible. What I found is that they are anti-socialist and anti-big government. I allowed myself to be lead to believe that they were anti-women's reproductive rights. But, the only thing I could dig up is that they both have taken the hard line on parental notification bypass. That's not really the end of the world. So, I stand corrected on Brown and Owens. However, I did read enough to be scared of some others still. here to swallow my pride and admit I have let myself be lazy and mislead.

I got fed up with you talking about this and went out to get some facts to back up my claim that these judges would be horrible. What I found is that they are anti-socialist and anti-big government. I allowed myself to be lead to believe that they were anti-women’s reproductive rights. But, the only thing I could dig up is that they both have taken the hard line on parental notification bypass. That’s not really the end of the world.

So, I stand corrected on Brown and Owens. However, I did read enough to be scared of some others still.

]]>